Spread the love

Victorious Governors Extend Hands Of Fellowship To Challengers After S’Court Verdicts

The governors of Lagos, Kano, Bauchi, Plateau, Abia, Akwa Ibom, Cross River and Zamfara states have waved the olive branch at their challengers and asked them to join them in moving the respective states forward following the affirmation of their elections by the Supreme Court on Friday.

The apex court held that Babajide Sanwo-Olu, Abba Yusuf, Bala Mohammed, Caleb Mutfwang, Alex Otti, Umo Eno, Bassey Otu and Dauda Lawal were the validly elected governors of their respective states, thereby putting to an end the controversies surrounding the 2023 governorship poll.

The Supreme Court set aside the lower courts’ decisions sacking the Kano State Governor, Abba Yusuf.

The governorship petition tribunal had set aside the victory of Yusuf of the New Nigeria People’s Party by declaring 165,663 of his votes invalid. The tribunal held that the deducted votes were from ballot papers that were neither stamped nor signed.

READ THIS  Gov. Ugwuanyi Tasks Administrators To Take Lead In Grassroots Development

He then approached the Court of Appeal for redress, but the appellate court upheld the tribunal’s decision and said the governor was not properly sponsored by the NNPP, thus violating the provisions of Section 177 (c) of the Constitution.

The Court of Appeal subsequently declared Nasiru Gawuna of the All Progressives Congress winner of the election.

At the Supreme Court, Justice John Okoro ordered that all the ballot papers from which the appellant’s votes were deducted should be restored to the governor.

He said the papers contained the logo of the Independent National Electoral Commission and the coat of arms as prescribed by the Electoral Act.

READ THIS  Science,Tech Revolution: Capacity Building Identified As Key To Mathematical Solutions

Justice Okoro also held that contrary to the position of the lower courts, a total of 146,292 of the ballot papers were confirmed to have been signed and stamped, only that they did not have any date.

“There is no proof that the said ballot papers were not the ones used for the election. Thus the decision of the Court of Appeal affirming the decision of the tribunal ought to be set aside,” he added.

He also held that the issue of party membership was an internal affair of political parties.

Justice Okoro stated that Section 177 (c) of the Constitution was to prevent independent candidature, adding, “The issue of nomination is exclusively the internal affairs of a political party. Therefore, it is not justiceable.

READ THIS  Exhibit Higher Wisdom And Responsibility Your New Ranks Bring”, CP Uzuegbu Charges Newly Promoted Officers<img

“The issue is also statute-barred. It is a pre-election contestable by co-aspirants. It is not within the right of the first respondent to question the appellant’s membership. The party did not deny sponsoring him.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call US Now